{"id":2928,"date":"2018-10-11T19:32:19","date_gmt":"2018-10-11T16:32:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/insanveinsan.org\/?p=2928"},"modified":"2018-10-16T20:03:26","modified_gmt":"2018-10-16T17:03:26","slug":"amartya-senin-adalet-dusuncesi-ve-adaletsizlik-problemi-icin-tarafsiz-gozlemci","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.insanveinsan.org\/en\/amartya-senin-adalet-dusuncesi-ve-adaletsizlik-problemi-icin-tarafsiz-gozlemci\/","title":{"rendered":"Amartya Sen\u2019s Idea of Justice and Impartial Spectator for the Question of Injustice"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

Abstract: <\/strong> In this study, it has been analyzed Amartya Sen\u2019s idea of justice and his proposal \u201cImpartial Spectator \u201cfor the question of injustice. In order understand Sen\u2019s idea of justice, his critique on Rawls\u2019 theory of justice should be considered. Sen\u2019s idea of justice could be read as a critique of Rawls\u2019 theory of justice as well as a suggestion of a new approach instead. For this reason, I will explicate Sen\u2019s idea of justice through his critique on Rawls\u2019 theory of justice. Apart from that, Impartial Spectator is important concept to understand Sen\u2019s idea of justice. Adam Smith proposes the impartial spectator as the standard for moral behaviors in the Theory of Moral Sentiments\u201d. Sen\u2019s takes this notion and use it in the realm of politics for the question of justice. Sen comes up with the idea of \u201cimpartial spectator\u201d as a solution for the question of justice in his works..<\/p>\n

Keywords: <\/strong> ustice, Impartial Spectator, Transcendental institutionalism, Social contract, Fairness.<\/p>\n

Amartya Sen\u2019in Adalet D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi ve Adaletsizlik Problemi i\u00e7in Tarafs\u0131z G\u00f6zlemci <\/h1>\n

\u00d6z: <\/strong> Bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmada Amartya Sen\u2019in adalet d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi ve adaletsizlik problemi i\u00e7in \u00f6nermi\u015f oldu\u011fu tarafs\u0131z g\u00f6zlemci kavram\u0131n\u0131 analiz edilmi\u015ftir. Amartya Sen\u2019in adalet d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesini tam manas\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131klayabilmek i\u00e7in onun John Rawls\u2019un adalet teorisi \u00fczerine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ele\u015ftiri dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r. Sen\u2019in adalet d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi Rawls\u2019un adalet teorisinin ele\u015ftirisi ve onun yerine sunulmu\u015f yeni bir yakla\u015f\u0131m olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclebilir. Bu sebepten bu makalede Amartya Sen\u2019in John Ralws ele\u015ftirisi a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131c\u0131 k\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131m. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tarafs\u0131z g\u00f6zlemci kavram\u0131 Amartya Sen\u2019in adalet teorisini anlamak i\u00e7in \u00f6nemli bir kavramd\u0131r. Adam Smith\u2019in Theory of Moral Sentiment adl\u0131 eserinde ahlaki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131m\u0131zn standart\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen diye \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131sz g\u00f6zlemci kavram\u0131n\u0131 Amartya Sen Adam Smith\u2019ten devralarak onu farkl\u0131 bir ba\u011flamda politik alandaki adalet problemine uyarlamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Amartya Sen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131nda tarafs\u0131z g\u00f6zlemci fikrini adalet sorununa bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm olarak \u00f6ne s\u00fcrer.<\/p>\n

Anahtar kelimeler: <\/strong> Adalet, Tarafs\u0131z G\u00f6zlemci, A\u015fk\u0131nsal kurumsalc\u0131l\u0131k, Toplum s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi, Hakkaniyet.<\/p>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Umut Da\u011f<\/p>\n

\n

DOI: 10.29224\/insanveinsan.422952<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Year 5, Issue 18, Fall 2018<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\"\"
\nTam metin \/ Full text
\n(English)<\/p>\n

\"Creative<\/a>
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/i><\/div>\n
[post-views]<\/div>\n
<\/i><\/div>\n
[sdm-download-counter id=\"2918\"]<\/div>\n


\n<\/div>\n[sdm_download id=\"2918\" fancy=\"0\" new_window=\"1\" color=\"grey\"]\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2928","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sayi-18-guz-2018"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.insanveinsan.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2928","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.insanveinsan.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.insanveinsan.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.insanveinsan.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.insanveinsan.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2928"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.insanveinsan.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2928\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.insanveinsan.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2928"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.insanveinsan.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2928"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.insanveinsan.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}